Soketi vs WeeChat
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Soketi
Self-hostable WebSocket server compatible with Pusher
VS
WeeChat
Extensible terminal-based chat client
| Feature | Soketi | WeeChat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,631 | ★ 3,366 |
| First released | 2021 | 2003 |
| Replaces | Pusher | Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose WeeChat if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Soketi or WeeChat better?
Soketi is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider WeeChat if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Soketi and WeeChat free and open-source?
Yes. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WeeChat under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Soketi and WeeChat with Docker?
Soketi: yes. WeeChat: check the project docs for container support.