Snowflake SSH Client vs Bastillion

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSnowflake SSH ClientBastillion
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,249★ 3,543
First released20192013
ReplacesMobaXterm, TermiusTeleport, Termius

Why pick each one

Choose Snowflake SSH Client if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
Snowflake SSH Client details

Choose Bastillion if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
Bastillion details

Frequently asked questions

Is Snowflake SSH Client or Bastillion better?

Neither is universally better. Bastillion has the larger community, while Snowflake SSH Client is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Snowflake SSH Client and Bastillion free and open-source?

Yes. Snowflake SSH Client is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Bastillion under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Snowflake SSH Client and Bastillion with Docker?

Snowflake SSH Client: check the project docs for container support. Bastillion: yes.

Related comparisons