frp vs Snowflake SSH Client
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
VS
Snowflake SSH Client
Graphical SSH and SFTP client with server monitoring
| Feature | frp | Snowflake SSH Client |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 108,622 | ★ 2,249 |
| First released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaces | ngrok | MobaXterm, Termius |
Why pick each one
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Snowflake SSH Client if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or Snowflake SSH Client better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while Snowflake SSH Client is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are frp and Snowflake SSH Client free and open-source?
Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Snowflake SSH Client under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run frp and Snowflake SSH Client with Docker?
frp: yes. Snowflake SSH Client: check the project docs for container support.