Snikket vs Wesh Network
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Snikket
Easy self-hosted XMPP chat for groups
VS
Wesh Network
P2P encrypted messaging protocol toolkit
| Feature | Snikket | Wesh Network |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Lua | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 437 | ★ 248 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal | Signal, WhatsApp |
Why pick each one
Choose Wesh Network if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Snikket or Wesh Network better?
Snikket is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Wesh Network if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Snikket and Wesh Network free and open-source?
Yes. Snikket is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wesh Network under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Snikket and Wesh Network with Docker?
Snikket: yes. Wesh Network: check the project docs for container support.