Metronome IM vs Snikket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Metronome IM
Lightweight, fork-based XMPP communication server
VS
Snikket
Easy self-hosted XMPP chat for groups
| Feature | Metronome IM | Snikket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Social Networks |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Lua | Lua |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 175 | ★ 437 |
| First released | 2012 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Slack, WhatsApp | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose Metronome IM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Lua
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Metronome IM or Snikket better?
Snikket is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Metronome IM if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Metronome IM and Snikket free and open-source?
Yes. Metronome IM is licensed under MIT and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Metronome IM and Snikket with Docker?
Metronome IM: yes. Snikket: yes.