SmartDNS vs Technitium DNS Server

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSmartDNSTechnitium DNS Server
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageCC#
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 11,183★ 9,449
First released20182017
ReplacesPi-hole, dnsmasqPi-hole, AdGuard Home

Why pick each one

Choose SmartDNS if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 11.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
SmartDNS details

Choose Technitium DNS Server if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Technitium DNS Server details

Frequently asked questions

Is SmartDNS or Technitium DNS Server better?

Neither is universally better. SmartDNS has the larger community, while Technitium DNS Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SmartDNS and Technitium DNS Server free and open-source?

Yes. SmartDNS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Technitium DNS Server under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SmartDNS and Technitium DNS Server with Docker?

SmartDNS: check the project docs for container support. Technitium DNS Server: yes.

Related comparisons