Skipper vs YARP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Skipper
HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition
VS
YARP
Reverse proxy toolkit for building proxies in .NET
| Feature | Skipper | YARP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, docker, binary | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,311 | ★ 9,587 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Nginx, Traefik | Nginx |
Why pick each one
Choose Skipper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Choose YARP if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.6k GitHub stars
- Written in C#
Frequently asked questions
Is Skipper or YARP better?
Neither is universally better. YARP has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Skipper and YARP free and open-source?
Yes. Skipper is licensed under Apache-2.0 and YARP under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Skipper and YARP with Docker?
Skipper: yes. YARP: yes.