Skipper vs Traefik
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Skipper
HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition
VS
Traefik
Cloud-native reverse proxy and load balancer
| Feature | Skipper | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,311 | ★ 64,330 |
| First released | 2016 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Nginx, Traefik | HAProxy, AWS ELB |
Why pick each one
Choose Skipper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Choose Traefik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Skipper or Traefik better?
Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Skipper and Traefik free and open-source?
Yes. Skipper is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Skipper and Traefik with Docker?
Skipper: yes. Traefik: yes.