Shlink Web Client vs spoo.me
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Shlink Web Client
Web dashboard for managing Shlink instances
VS
spoo.me
Open-source URL shortener with click stats
| Feature | Shlink Web Client | spoo.me |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 391 | ★ 240 |
| First released | 2018 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Bitly | Bitly, Cuttly |
Why pick each one
Choose Shlink Web Client if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Choose spoo.me if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Shlink Web Client or spoo.me better?
Neither is universally better. Shlink Web Client has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Shlink Web Client and spoo.me free and open-source?
Yes. Shlink Web Client is licensed under MIT and spoo.me under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Shlink Web Client and spoo.me with Docker?
Shlink Web Client: yes. spoo.me: yes.