Shaper vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Shaper | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,165 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Shaper if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Shaper or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Shaper if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Shaper and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Shaper is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Shaper and Umami with Docker?
Shaper: yes. Umami: yes.