Metabase vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Metabase
Open-source business intelligence and dashboards
VS
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
| Feature | Metabase | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Clojure | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 48,597 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Tableau, Looker | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Metabase if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 48.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Clojure
Frequently asked questions
Is Metabase or Umami better?
Neither is universally better. Metabase has the larger community, while Umami is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Metabase and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Metabase is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Metabase and Umami with Docker?
Metabase: yes. Umami: yes.