Mozilla SOPS vs Browserpass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mozilla SOPS
Encrypt secrets in config files for version control
VS
Browserpass
Browser extension front-end for the pass manager
| Feature | Mozilla SOPS | Browserpass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MPL-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,713 | ★ 1,009 |
| First released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Replaces | AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault | LastPass extension, 1Password extension |
Why pick each one
Choose Browserpass if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Mozilla SOPS or Browserpass better?
Neither is universally better. Mozilla SOPS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mozilla SOPS and Browserpass free and open-source?
Yes. Mozilla SOPS is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Browserpass under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mozilla SOPS and Browserpass with Docker?
Mozilla SOPS: check the project docs for container support. Browserpass: check the project docs for container support.