git-crypt vs Mozilla SOPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
git-crypt
Transparent file encryption for secrets stored in git
VS
Mozilla SOPS
Encrypt secrets in config files for version control
| Feature | git-crypt | Mozilla SOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,837 | ★ 22,713 |
| First released | 2013 | 2015 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager | AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is git-crypt or Mozilla SOPS better?
Neither is universally better. Mozilla SOPS has the larger community, while git-crypt is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are git-crypt and Mozilla SOPS free and open-source?
Yes. git-crypt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mozilla SOPS under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run git-crypt and Mozilla SOPS with Docker?
git-crypt: check the project docs for container support. Mozilla SOPS: check the project docs for container support.