One-Time Secret vs Mozilla SOPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
One-Time Secret
Share sensitive credentials with self-destructing links
VS
Mozilla SOPS
Encrypt secrets in config files for version control
| Feature | One-Time Secret | Mozilla SOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,894 | ★ 22,713 |
| First released | 2012 | 2015 |
| Replaces | 1Password, Doppler | AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault |
Why pick each one
Choose One-Time Secret if…
- Great for one-off credential sharing
- Easy to self-host
Frequently asked questions
Is One-Time Secret or Mozilla SOPS better?
Neither is universally better. Mozilla SOPS has the larger community, while One-Time Secret is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are One-Time Secret and Mozilla SOPS free and open-source?
Yes. One-Time Secret is licensed under MIT and Mozilla SOPS under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run One-Time Secret and Mozilla SOPS with Docker?
One-Time Secret: yes. Mozilla SOPS: check the project docs for container support.