SeaweedFS vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 87,439
First released20152014
ReplacesAmazon S3Dropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SeaweedFS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are SeaweedFS and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Syncthing with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons