Scrypted vs ESPEasy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Scrypted
High-performance smart home and camera platform
VS
ESPEasy
Multifunctional firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 sensors
| Feature | Scrypted | ESPEasy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,839 | ★ 3,536 |
| First released | 2021 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Google Home | Tuya |
Why pick each one
Choose ESPEasy if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (3.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrypted or ESPEasy better?
Neither is universally better. Scrypted has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Scrypted and ESPEasy free and open-source?
Yes. Scrypted is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ESPEasy under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Scrypted and ESPEasy with Docker?
Scrypted: yes. ESPEasy: check the project docs for container support.