Scrutiny vs smartctl Exporter
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Scrutiny
Web dashboard for hard drive SMART health monitoring
VS
smartctl Exporter
Prometheus exporter for disk SMART health data
| Feature | Scrutiny | smartctl Exporter |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,064 | ★ 573 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | CrystalDiskInfo | CrystalDiskInfo |
Why pick each one
Choose smartctl Exporter if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrutiny or smartctl Exporter better?
Scrutiny is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider smartctl Exporter if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Scrutiny and smartctl Exporter free and open-source?
Yes. Scrutiny is licensed under MIT and smartctl Exporter under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Scrutiny and smartctl Exporter with Docker?
Scrutiny: yes. smartctl Exporter: yes.