SHSelfHostIndex

SchildiChat vs Snikket

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SC SchildiChat Element-based Matrix client with extra usability tweaks VS SN Snikket Easy self-hosted XMPP chat for groups
FeatureSchildiChatSnikket
CategoryMatrix & XMPPSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageShellLua
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 465★ 437
First released20202020
ReplacesSlack, WhatsAppWhatsApp, Signal

Why pick each one

Choose SchildiChat if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
SchildiChat details

Choose Snikket if…

  • Very easy to deploy
  • Polished mobile apps
Snikket details

Frequently asked questions

Is SchildiChat or Snikket better?

Neither is universally better. SchildiChat has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SchildiChat and Snikket free and open-source?

Yes. SchildiChat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SchildiChat and Snikket with Docker?

SchildiChat: yes. Snikket: yes.

Related comparisons