Ryot vs Yamtrack
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Ryot | Yamtrack |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 88 · Excellent | 88 · Excellent |
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 200 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,606 | ★ 3,627 |
| First released | 2023 | None |
| Replaces | Trakt, Goodreads | Goodreads, IMDB, MyAnimeList |
What are Ryot and Yamtrack?
Ryot
Ryot is a self-hosted application for tracking everything you consume, including movies, TV shows, video games, books, podcasts, and fitness. It provides a unified dashboard with metadata from many providers.
- Tracks many media categories
- Unified consumption dashboard
- Fitness tracking included
- Multiple metadata sources
Yamtrack
Media tracker for movies, TV shows, anime, manga, games, books and more.
Ryot vs Yamtrack: key differences
Ryot is written in TypeScript, while Yamtrack is built with Python. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Ryot versus AGPL-3.0-or-later for Yamtrack. Yamtrack is the lighter option, starting around 200 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Ryot. Ryot lists first-class Docker deployment; Yamtrack does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Ryot if…
- Very broad tracking
- Active development
Watch out for
- Not a media player
- Setup has options to learn
Choose Yamtrack if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Ryot or Yamtrack better?
Neither is universally better. Yamtrack has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Ryot and Yamtrack free and open-source?
Yes. Ryot is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Yamtrack under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ryot and Yamtrack with Docker?
Ryot: yes. Yamtrack: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Ryot or Yamtrack?
Yamtrack has the smaller minimum footprint at 200 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Ryot. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.