Ryot vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureRyotSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 3,518★ 29,105
First released20232025
ReplacesTrakt, Goodreads

Why pick each one

Choose Ryot if…

  • Very broad tracking
  • Active development
Ryot details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ryot or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Ryot and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Ryot is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ryot and SRS with Docker?

Ryot: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons