Komf vs Ryot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Komf
Metadata fetcher for Komga and Kavita libraries
VS
Ryot
Self-hosted tracker for movies, shows, books, games, and more
| Feature | Komf | Ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | Media Servers |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Kotlin | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 691 | ★ 3,518 |
| First released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Goodreads | Trakt, Goodreads |
Why pick each one
Choose Komf if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Kotlin
Frequently asked questions
Is Komf or Ryot better?
Neither is universally better. Ryot has the larger community, while Komf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Komf and Ryot free and open-source?
Yes. Komf is licensed under MIT and Ryot under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Komf and Ryot with Docker?
Komf: yes. Ryot: yes.