DeDRM Tools vs Komf

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDeDRM ToolsKomf
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryE-books & Media Library
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonKotlin
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 15,275★ 691
First released20142022
ReplacesAdobe Digital EditionsGoodreads

Why pick each one

Choose DeDRM Tools if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 15.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
DeDRM Tools details

Choose Komf if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Kotlin
Komf details

Frequently asked questions

Is DeDRM Tools or Komf better?

Neither is universally better. DeDRM Tools has the larger community, while Komf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are DeDRM Tools and Komf free and open-source?

Yes. DeDRM Tools is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Komf under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DeDRM Tools and Komf with Docker?

DeDRM Tools: check the project docs for container support. Komf: yes.

Related comparisons