Rygel vs Universal Media Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rygel
GNOME UPnP/DLNA media sharing server
VS
Universal Media Server
DLNA-compliant media server for streaming to TVs and consoles
| Feature | Rygel | Universal Media Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Vala | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 2,636 |
| First released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Plex | Plex, Serviio |
Why pick each one
Choose Rygel if…
- Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
- Written in Vala
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Universal Media Server if…
- Works with old TVs and consoles
- Simple setup
Frequently asked questions
Is Rygel or Universal Media Server better?
Universal Media Server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rygel if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Rygel and Universal Media Server free and open-source?
Yes. Rygel is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Universal Media Server under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rygel and Universal Media Server with Docker?
Rygel: check the project docs for container support. Universal Media Server: yes.