SHSelfHostIndex

Rustic vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
RU Rustic Fast encrypted deduplicated backup compatible with Restic VS BA Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync
FeatureRusticBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageRustShell
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 3,170★ 3,608
First released20222014
ReplacesBackblaze, CrashPlanTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Rustic if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Rustic details

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Rustic or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?

Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rustic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Rustic and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Rustic is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Rustic and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?

Rustic: check the project docs for container support. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons