RSSBox vs rsspls
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RSSBox
Generate RSS feeds for sites without native feeds
VS
rsspls
Generate RSS feeds for websites that lack them
| Feature | RSSBox | rsspls |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 814 | ★ 411 |
| First released | 2016 | 2022 |
| Replaces | RSS-Bridge | RSS-Bridge |
Why pick each one
Choose RSSBox if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
Choose rsspls if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is RSSBox or rsspls better?
Neither is universally better. RSSBox has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are RSSBox and rsspls free and open-source?
Yes. RSSBox is licensed under MIT and rsspls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RSSBox and rsspls with Docker?
RSSBox: yes. rsspls: check the project docs for container support.