Winds vs yarr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureWindsyarr
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 9,115★ 3,919
First released20172020
ReplacesFeedlyFeedly, Google Reader

Why pick each one

Choose Winds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Winds details

Choose yarr if…

  • Extremely simple to run
  • Tiny footprint
  • No dependencies
yarr details

Frequently asked questions

Is Winds or yarr better?

Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while yarr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Winds and yarr free and open-source?

Yes. Winds is licensed under MIT and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Winds and yarr with Docker?

Winds: yes. yarr: yes.

Related comparisons