Winds vs selfoss

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureWindsselfoss
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptHTML
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 9,115★ 2,469
First released20172012
ReplacesFeedlyGoogle Reader, Feedly

Why pick each one

Choose Winds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Winds details

Choose selfoss if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
selfoss details

Frequently asked questions

Is Winds or selfoss better?

Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while selfoss is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Winds and selfoss free and open-source?

Yes. Winds is licensed under MIT and selfoss under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Winds and selfoss with Docker?

Winds: yes. selfoss: yes.

Related comparisons