Winds vs Russ
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Winds | Russ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,115 | ★ 268 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Russ if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Winds or Russ better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Russ is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Winds and Russ free and open-source?
Yes. Winds is licensed under MIT and Russ under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Winds and Russ with Docker?
Winds: yes. Russ: check the project docs for container support.