feed2toot vs Winds
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
feed2toot
Automatically post RSS feed items to Mastodon
VS
Winds
Beautiful open-source RSS and podcast application
| Feature | feed2toot | Winds |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 9,115 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | IFTTT | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose feed2toot if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is feed2toot or Winds better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while feed2toot is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are feed2toot and Winds free and open-source?
Yes. feed2toot is licensed under MIT and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run feed2toot and Winds with Docker?
feed2toot: check the project docs for container support. Winds: yes.