Winds vs rsspls
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Winds
Beautiful open-source RSS and podcast application
VS
rsspls
Generate RSS feeds for websites that lack them
| Feature | Winds | rsspls |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,115 | ★ 411 |
| First released | 2017 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Feedly | RSS-Bridge |
Why pick each one
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose rsspls if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Winds or rsspls better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while rsspls is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Winds and rsspls free and open-source?
Yes. Winds is licensed under MIT and rsspls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Winds and rsspls with Docker?
Winds: yes. rsspls: check the project docs for container support.