Feed dashboard nono Reader-self vs Stringer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up? Compare Feed dashboard nono Reader-self with Compare Stringer with

FE Feed dashboard nono Reader-self PHP RSS aggregator with a Google Reader API VS ST Stringer Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader

Feature	Feed dashboard nono Reader-self	Stringer
Deploy effort	Under-an-hour setup	Under-an-hour setup
Health score	5 · At risk	86 · Excellent
Category	RSS & News Readers	RSS & News Readers
License	MIT	MIT
Language	PHP	Ruby
Setup difficulty	Easy	Medium
Min. RAM	128 MB	512 MB
Deployment	bare-metal, docker	docker, bare-metal
GitHub stars	★ 153	★ 4,133
First released	2013	2013
Replaces	Google Reader, Feedly	Feedly, Google Reader

What are Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Stringer?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self

Reader Self is a self-hosted RSS and Atom feed aggregator written in PHP with a responsive interface. It exposes a Google Reader compatible API for use with mobile applications.

Google Reader API support
Responsive interface
Works with mobile clients

Stringer

Stringer is a self-hosted, anti-social RSS reader with no external dependencies on third-party services. It targets users who want a private, no-frills feed reader. It is deployed via a Ruby stack or Docker.

No third-party dependencies
Keyboard shortcuts
Simple unread-focused view
Self-contained

Read the full Stringer guide →

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self vs Stringer: key differences

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is written in PHP, while Stringer is built with Ruby. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Stringer. Stringer has the considerably larger community, at 4,133 GitHub stars versus 153.

Why pick each one

Choose Feed dashboard nono Reader-self if…

Released under the MIT license
Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
First-class Docker support for quick deployment
Written in PHP

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self details

Choose Stringer if…

Private and minimal
Easy reading flow
No external services

Watch out for

Slow development
Basic feature set

Stringer details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feed dashboard nono Reader-self or Stringer better?

Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community, while Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Stringer free and open-source?

Yes. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is licensed under MIT and Stringer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Stringer with Docker?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self: yes. Stringer: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Feed dashboard nono Reader-self or Stringer?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Stringer. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.