Coldsweat vs yarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Coldsweat
Web RSS aggregator and reader with a Fever API
VS
yarr
Yet another RSS reader as a single binary
| Feature | Coldsweat | yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | SCSS | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 146 | ★ 3,919 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Reader, Feedly | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose Coldsweat if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in SCSS
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Coldsweat or yarr better?
yarr is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coldsweat if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Coldsweat and yarr free and open-source?
Yes. Coldsweat is licensed under MIT and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Coldsweat and yarr with Docker?
Coldsweat: yes. yarr: yes.