Coldsweat vs Newspipe

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureColdsweatNewspipe
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageSCSSPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 146★ 7
First released20132010
ReplacesGoogle Reader, FeedlyFeedly, Google Reader

Why pick each one

Choose Coldsweat if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in SCSS
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Coldsweat details

Choose Newspipe if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Newspipe details

Frequently asked questions

Is Coldsweat or Newspipe better?

Neither is universally better. Coldsweat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Coldsweat and Newspipe free and open-source?

Yes. Coldsweat is licensed under MIT and Newspipe under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Coldsweat and Newspipe with Docker?

Coldsweat: yes. Newspipe: yes.

Related comparisons