Coldsweat vs RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureColdsweatRSS aggregator nono KrISS feed
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageSCSSPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 146★ 291
First released20132012
ReplacesGoogle Reader, FeedlyGoogle Reader, Feedly

Why pick each one

Choose Coldsweat if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in SCSS
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Coldsweat details

Choose RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed details

Frequently asked questions

Is Coldsweat or RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed better?

RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coldsweat if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Coldsweat and RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed free and open-source?

Yes. Coldsweat is licensed under MIT and RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Coldsweat and RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed with Docker?

Coldsweat: yes. RSS aggregator nono KrISS feed: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons