RSS Guard vs RSSBox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RSS Guard
Cross-platform desktop feed reader with plugin support
VS
RSSBox
Generate RSS feeds for sites without native feeds
| Feature | RSS Guard | RSSBox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C++ | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,711 | ★ 814 |
| First released | 2013 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Feedly | RSS-Bridge |
Why pick each one
Choose RSS Guard if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Choose RSSBox if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is RSS Guard or RSSBox better?
Neither is universally better. RSS Guard has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are RSS Guard and RSSBox free and open-source?
Yes. RSS Guard is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RSSBox under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RSS Guard and RSSBox with Docker?
RSS Guard: check the project docs for container support. RSSBox: yes.