RSS-Bridge vs Wallabag
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RSS-Bridge
Generate RSS feeds for websites that lack them
VS
Wallabag
Self-hosted read-it-later application
| Feature | RSS-Bridge | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | Unlicense | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,154 | ★ 12,884 |
| First released | 2014 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Pocket, Instapaper |
Why pick each one
Choose RSS-Bridge if…
- Released under the Unlicense license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.2k GitHub stars
Choose Wallabag if…
- Great read-it-later experience
- Own your reading list
- Apps available
Frequently asked questions
Is RSS-Bridge or Wallabag better?
Neither is universally better. Wallabag has the larger community, while RSS-Bridge is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are RSS-Bridge and Wallabag free and open-source?
Yes. RSS-Bridge is licensed under Unlicense and Wallabag under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RSS-Bridge and Wallabag with Docker?
RSS-Bridge: yes. Wallabag: yes.