rs-short vs Simple-URL-Shortener

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurers-shortSimple-URL-Shortener
CategoryURL ShortenersURL Shorteners
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageRustPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 59
First released20202015
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose rs-short if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
rs-short details

Choose Simple-URL-Shortener if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Simple-URL-Shortener details

Frequently asked questions

Is rs-short or Simple-URL-Shortener better?

Neither is universally better. Simple-URL-Shortener has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are rs-short and Simple-URL-Shortener free and open-source?

Yes. rs-short is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Simple-URL-Shortener under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run rs-short and Simple-URL-Shortener with Docker?

rs-short: check the project docs for container support. Simple-URL-Shortener: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons