Dub vs Simple-URL-Shortener
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dub
Open-source link management platform
VS
Simple-URL-Shortener
KISS URL shortener, public or private (with account)
| Feature | Dub | Simple-URL-Shortener |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24,245 | ★ 59 |
| First released | 2022 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Bitly, Rebrandly | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Simple-URL-Shortener if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Dub or Simple-URL-Shortener better?
Neither is universally better. Dub has the larger community, while Simple-URL-Shortener is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dub and Simple-URL-Shortener free and open-source?
Yes. Dub is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Simple-URL-Shortener under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dub and Simple-URL-Shortener with Docker?
Dub: yes. Simple-URL-Shortener: check the project docs for container support.