Robusta vs Sensu Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Robusta
Kubernetes observability and automated troubleshooting
VS
Sensu Go
Monitoring as code pipeline for cloud and bare metal
| Feature | Robusta | Sensu Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,072 | ★ 1,108 |
| First released | 2021 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Datadog, PagerDuty | Datadog, PagerDuty |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Robusta or Sensu Go better?
Neither is universally better. Robusta has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Robusta and Sensu Go free and open-source?
Yes. Robusta is licensed under MIT and Sensu Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Robusta and Sensu Go with Docker?
Robusta: check the project docs for container support. Sensu Go: yes.