SHSelfHostIndex

Restic Browser vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
RE Restic Browser Desktop app to browse and restore Restic snapshots VS BA Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync
FeatureRestic BrowserBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
Health score76 · Good30 · At risk
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptShell
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 1,306★ 3,609
First released20222014
ReplacesTime MachineTime Machine

What are Restic Browser and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup?

Restic Browser

Restic Browser is a cross-platform desktop application that lets you explore the contents of Restic backup repositories and restore individual files. It provides a graphical alternative to the CLI.

  • Browse Restic snapshots visually
  • Restore individual files
  • Cross-platform desktop app

Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

rsync-time-backup is a script that provides Time Machine-style incremental backups using rsync. It creates hard-linked snapshots so each backup appears as a full copy while saving disk space.

  • Time Machine-style snapshots
  • Hard-link deduplication
  • Single portable script

Restic Browser vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: key differences

Restic Browser is written in TypeScript, while Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is built with Shell. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Restic Browser. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is the more established project (first released 2014), while Restic Browser arrived in 2022. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup has the considerably larger community, at 3,609 GitHub stars versus 1,306.

Why pick each one

Choose Restic Browser if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Restic Browser details

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Restic Browser or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?

Neither is universally better. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Restic Browser and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Restic Browser is licensed under MIT and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Restic Browser and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?

Restic Browser: check the project docs for container support. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Restic Browser or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup?

Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Restic Browser. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons