CodiMD vs Rustpad
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CodiMD
Realtime collaborative Markdown notes platform
VS
Rustpad
Minimal collaborative real-time text editor
| Feature | CodiMD | Rustpad |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Office Suites | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,127 | ★ 4,070 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Google Docs, HackMD | Google Docs, Etherpad |
Why pick each one
Choose CodiMD if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is CodiMD or Rustpad better?
Neither is universally better. CodiMD has the larger community, while Rustpad is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CodiMD and Rustpad free and open-source?
Yes. CodiMD is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rustpad under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CodiMD and Rustpad with Docker?
CodiMD: yes. Rustpad: yes.