Etherpad vs CodiMD

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEtherpadCodiMD
CategoryChat & CommunicationOffice Suites
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 18,481★ 10,127
First released20112016
ReplacesGoogle DocsGoogle Docs, HackMD

Why pick each one

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Choose CodiMD if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
CodiMD details

Frequently asked questions

Is Etherpad or CodiMD better?

Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Etherpad and CodiMD free and open-source?

Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CodiMD under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Etherpad and CodiMD with Docker?

Etherpad: yes. CodiMD: yes.

Related comparisons