Readarr vs Yamtrack
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Readarr
E-book and audiobook collection manager
VS
Yamtrack
Media tracker for movies, TV shows, anime, manga, games, books and
| Feature | Readarr | Yamtrack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | C# | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 200 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,476 | ★ 3,306 |
| First released | 2020 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Goodreads, Audible | Goodreads, IMDB, MyAnimeList |
Why pick each one
Choose Readarr if…
- Automates collection
- Familiar Servarr interface
- Good metadata tracking
Choose Yamtrack if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Readarr or Yamtrack better?
Neither is universally better. Readarr has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Readarr and Yamtrack free and open-source?
Yes. Readarr is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Yamtrack under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Readarr and Yamtrack with Docker?
Readarr: yes. Yamtrack: check the project docs for container support.