BookWyrm vs Yamtrack
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BookWyrm
Federated social reading and book review platform
VS
Yamtrack
Media tracker for movies, TV shows, anime, manga, games, books and
| Feature | BookWyrm | Yamtrack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 200 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,762 | ★ 3,306 |
| First released | 2020 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Goodreads, StoryGraph | Goodreads, IMDB, MyAnimeList |
Why pick each one
Choose Yamtrack if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is BookWyrm or Yamtrack better?
Neither is universally better. Yamtrack has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are BookWyrm and Yamtrack free and open-source?
Yes. BookWyrm is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Yamtrack under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BookWyrm and Yamtrack with Docker?
BookWyrm: yes. Yamtrack: check the project docs for container support.