SHSelfHostIndex

Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta vs ZFS Autobackup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DU Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta Backup and restore solution for PostgreSQL VS ZF ZFS Autobackup Automated ZFS snapshot and replication tool
FeatureDuplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmonetaZFS Autobackup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseGPL-2.0
LanguageCPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 303★ 794
First released20212012
ReplacesVeeamVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta details

Choose ZFS Autobackup if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
ZFS Autobackup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta or ZFS Autobackup better?

ZFS Autobackup is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta and ZFS Autobackup free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and ZFS Autobackup under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta and ZFS Autobackup with Docker?

Duplicacy alt MailpileBackup nono pgmoneta: check the project docs for container support. ZFS Autobackup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons