Chatwoot vs Tox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureChatwootTox
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageRubyC
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metalbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 35,596★ 2,670
First released20192013
ReplacesIntercom, Zendesk, DriftSkype, Discord

Why pick each one

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Choose Tox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Tox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatwoot or Tox better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Chatwoot and Tox free and open-source?

Yes. Chatwoot is licensed under MIT and Tox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Chatwoot and Tox with Docker?

Chatwoot: yes. Tox: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons