Chatwoot vs SIPCAPTURE Homer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureChatwootSIPCAPTURE Homer
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageRubyGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 35,596★ 2,004
First released20192026
ReplacesIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Choose SIPCAPTURE Homer if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
SIPCAPTURE Homer details

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatwoot or SIPCAPTURE Homer better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Chatwoot and SIPCAPTURE Homer free and open-source?

Yes. Chatwoot is licensed under MIT and SIPCAPTURE Homer under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Chatwoot and SIPCAPTURE Homer with Docker?

Chatwoot: yes. SIPCAPTURE Homer: yes.

Related comparisons