Pikrellcam vs RPi Cam Web Interface
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Pikrellcam
Raspberry Pi motion-detection camera with web interface
VS
RPi Cam Web Interface
Web-based control and streaming for the Raspberry Pi camera
| Feature | Pikrellcam | RPi Cam Web Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 273 | ★ 1,599 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Pikrellcam or RPi Cam Web Interface better?
RPi Cam Web Interface is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pikrellcam if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Pikrellcam and RPi Cam Web Interface free and open-source?
Yes. Pikrellcam is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RPi Cam Web Interface under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pikrellcam and RPi Cam Web Interface with Docker?
Pikrellcam: check the project docs for container support. RPi Cam Web Interface: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Pikrellcam vs Cameradar
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Cameradar
- Pikrellcam vs Camera.UI
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Camera.UI
- Pikrellcam vs CompreFace
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs CompreFace
- Pikrellcam vs Double Take
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Double Take
- Pikrellcam vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Sighthound Surveillance Station