Pinry vs Wiki.js
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Pinry
Tiling image board and bookmark system for visual collections
VS
Wiki.js
Modern and powerful open-source wiki
| Feature | Pinry | Wiki.js |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,402 | ★ 28,727 |
| First released | 2012 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Raindrop.io | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Pinry if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose Wiki.js if…
- Flexible and full-featured
- Many auth options
- Good content management
Frequently asked questions
Is Pinry or Wiki.js better?
Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Pinry and Wiki.js free and open-source?
Yes. Pinry is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pinry and Wiki.js with Docker?
Pinry: yes. Wiki.js: yes.