Quickwit vs Whoogle Search
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
VS
Whoogle Search
Self-hosted, ad-free, privacy-respecting Google search proxy
| Feature | Quickwit | Whoogle Search |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,471 | ★ 11,595 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Elasticsearch | Google Search |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Quickwit or Whoogle Search better?
Whoogle Search is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Quickwit if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Quickwit and Whoogle Search free and open-source?
Yes. Quickwit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Whoogle Search under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quickwit and Whoogle Search with Docker?
Quickwit: yes. Whoogle Search: yes.